autoconfiscation? (was: Re: subscribe joostvb-cabot-commit@mdcc.cx)
Joost van Baal
joostvb-cabot-devel-20030723-7@mdcc.cx
Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:17:33 +0200
--qZLIv6EoKi7YuaSc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 03:48:43PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Joost van Baal wrote:
> > PS: I'm planning to write a Makefile.in and a configure for cabot. =20
My initial idea was to base these upon autotools generated ones.
> > Do
> > you think that'd be useful? (The current "config" file might have to
> > get moved to e.g. ~/.cabotrc . OK?)
>=20
> Sounds good.
Hm, at second thought, I guess I'm going all the way and autoconfiscate
the whole thing. How about that? I've done this a few times before, it
allows for easy autogeneration of version numbers and tarballs (
building cabot-20030723.tar.gz by running "make dist"). An example is
at http://mdcc.cx/pub/ad1810-firewall/ad1810-firewall-latest/ : what's
maintained in CVS is
http://mdcc.cx/pub/ad1810-firewall/ad1810-firewall-latest/Makefile.am ,
http://mdcc.cx/pub/ad1810-firewall/ad1810-firewall-latest/bootstrap ,
http://mdcc.cx/pub/ad1810-firewall/ad1810-firewall-latest/configure.ac
and http://mdcc.cx/pub/ad1810-firewall/ad1810-firewall-latest/setversion
=2E
I know some people start screaming in agony when hearing about
autotools, so I'd guess I'd better first ask :)
Bye,
Joost
--qZLIv6EoKi7YuaSc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/HqcNBgac8paUV/ARAv+TAJ9BFFyemgEfV5emyJz93gRvE7iDVQCgjZ49
tCK9sQo+DpTQk2EQ02XhgRE=
=2tNy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--qZLIv6EoKi7YuaSc--