Bug#242117: still not ready?

[Laurent Fousse]

Hi,

* Matej Vela [Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 11:10:09AM +0200]:
> Hello,
> 
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:44:43AM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > Hi,
> > ist cabot still not ready for testing?
> 
> Let's see what the developers think.  Is cabot ready for etch, or
> should we wait until someone adopts it?

#289417 and #280588 are not going to happen because last time I
checked, nobody was volunteer to continue maintaining cabot
_upstream-wise_. Considering the fact that cabot was never part of
testing *and* that a significant part of upstream thinks something
along the line of  "Oh well, caff is part of the signing-party package
and is good enough/better than cabot anyway so why bother" so my
opinion is that letting cabot in etch as-is is a bad idea.

cabot needs someone that's interested in upstream development before
we let it go in etch. Merely adopting the debian package is not enough
for our users.

Cheers,

Laurent.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://lists.noreply.org/pipermail/cabot-devel/attachments/20050919/b539f93f/attachment.pgp