More questions about Echolot (still trying to be reliable)

Peter Palfrader peter@palfrader.org
Tue, 2 Sep 2003 06:48:29 +0200


--CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, 01 Sep 2003, Hermes Admin wrote:

> Seeing error messages helped, but it showed that all day, there were no b=
ounces from hermes back to the pinger=20
> (which I would think would imply that the remailer is rather reliable). B=
ut... Echolot is reporting only about=20
> 47-50% uptime. This is an improvement from where it was before (I killed =
SpamAssassin and that seemed to do it),=20
> but I was expecting more of an improvement, especially with no bounce mes=
sages.
>=20
> My question is this. Does the uptime percentage cover the total average o=
f the last 12 days, the last 1 day, or=20
> less? I'm thinking that if it's for the whole 12 days, then I need to wai=
t a bit so the days when the remailer was=20
> down for 3 days (for thinking that there were no reliable remailers anywh=
ere, for some strange reason), and the=20
> percentage will just magically go up.=20
>=20
> Is this correct, or do I need to keep troubleshooting, since I'm only at =
50%?

It covers the whole 12 days.  Look at your version 2 stats, or checkout
my meta stats:

http://www.noreply.org/meta/status.hermes.txt

Type 2:
aarg:        hermes       A????432?141   2:54   600006+80++8   49.3%  D R G=
O  TLEUIN=20
banana:      hermes       A????2221B21   4:21   600003+81+8+   47.9%  D R G=
O  TLEUIN=20
bigapple:    hermes       ??????11?C31   6:21   ?0000?+60++8   52.3%  D R G=
O  TLEUIN=20
chicago:     hermes       E????233?C11   7:02   300008+60+88   45.8%  D R G=
O  TLEUIN=20
citrus:      hermes       E????AA4?A53   9:20   400008880++6   45.1%  D R G=
O  TLEUIN=20
cside:       hermes       B????322?B21   5:15   600006+60+++   50.0%  D R G=
O  TLEUIN=20
dingo:       hermes       B???B423?B31   6:32   600056880+++   52.8%  D R G=
O  TLEUIN=20
dot:         hermes       A???9432?B21   4:05   100036++0+8+   50.0%  D R G=
O  TLEUIN=20
efga:        hermes          -  +**-****  1:37:54  95.37% [ignored]
freedom:     hermes       B????322?611   2:14   300005+70+9+   73.6%  D R G=
O  TLEUIN  [ignored]
frell:       hermes       7???5412HHD5  16:37   700048+62+++   56.9%  D R G=
O  TLEUIN  [ignored]
gurski:      hermes       B???1371?721   3:57   400018+70++8   51.4%  D R G=
O  TLEUIN=20
hermes:      hermes       3???0312?A11   3:14   500018+80+88   50.0%  D R G=
O  TLEUIN  [ignored]
italy:       hermes       A???4421?B31   4:47   800025760+87   45.2%  D R G=
O  TLEUIN=20
noreply:     hermes       B???622A?211   1:11   700005+4098+   55.9%  D R G=
O  TLEUIN  [ignored]
panta:       hermes       A????222?722   3:13   500005+60+8+   45.8%  D R G=
O  TLEUIN=20
randseed:    hermes       A????321?111   1:46   500008+50+88   48.6%  D R G=
O  TLEUIN=20
senshi:      hermes       A????323?211   1:53   500005++0+++   48.8%  D R G=
O  TLEUIN=20
                                                ^          ^
                                          12 days ago     now

Peter
--=20
Cannot verify the sig?  Update 94C09C7F from subkeys.pgp.net.

--CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/VCEdz/ccs6+kS90RAoiIAJ9k3V1t+O0R51Xn5Qq+l8bii5K0TwCeMzNB
YAwBjNHR+ts3y3GxC+jiZY8=
=dcmn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK--