Question: how echolot determines reliability of middlemen
Peter Palfrader
peter@palfrader.org
Tue, 9 Sep 2003 19:28:26 +0200
--/04w6evG8XlLl3ft
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, 09 Sep 2003, Hermes Admin wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out why hermes has suddenly lost a lot of reliabilit=
y=20
> in the last few days. I had 4 days of 90-100% and then I dropped to 30-60=
%=20
> for a few days.
>=20
> My question is how echolot determines the reliability of middlemen. Since=
=20
> any message going through a middleman subsequently goes through another=
=20
> exit node, how does echolot separate the reliability of the middleman vs.=
=20
> the exit node? Does the reliability of the random exit node affect the=20
> stats for the middleman?
Right now it's the middleman that randhops the message, so it's its job
to select a reliable exit node. echolot doesn't care how the message
returns, only whether it returns.
This reflects the use case where a middleman node is at the end of a
chain. I realize that this isn't perfect and would like to change it.
Any suggestions apprechiated.
Peter
--=20
Cannot verify the sig? Update 94C09C7F from subkeys.pgp.net.
--/04w6evG8XlLl3ft
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/Xg25z/ccs6+kS90RAv5dAJ4kg2ARHIP+noR50KDrzd9s89Jw2ACdGEed
9aqcimS1KG0HoFGk8hf42t4=
=wq1+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--/04w6evG8XlLl3ft--